since 2006 Help Sitemap |
|||||||||||
< News > | |||||||||||
< January 2015 > | |||||||||||
< 27th > | |||||||||||
2015/01/27(Tuesday) | |||||||||||
Title | Academic Personality | ||||||||||
Writer | Yuichi Uda | ||||||||||
A few days ago, I saw an introduction of EPR experiment for general people on TV. I agree that this experiment is very important and very interesting. However, differently from the inventor of the experiment, when I first knew the experiment, I did not wonder if the result of it would be. Before knowing the result of this experiment, I strongly thought that Bohr would be right and Einstein would be wrong. I thought so because I thought that the quantum mechanics is exquisite as an academic person. I supposed that he never makes a mistake. When I was a student, I was very much impressed with the description that a wave function of two particles(i = 1, 2) is not ψ(x, y, z; i) but ψ(x1, y1, z1; x2, y2, z2) in a textbook. I understood that this grammar was proved valid by being applied to the problem of hydrogen atom and the two-body scattering problem in the textbook. By evaluating how a physical theory is exquisite as an academic person, we can prejudge the correctness of it before doing all experiments. |
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|
|||||||||||
|